<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: Lila by Robert Pirsig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.betterworldbooks.com/2008/10/28/book-review-lila-by-robert-pirsig/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.betterworldbooks.com/2008/10/28/book-review-lila-by-robert-pirsig/</link>
	<description>Book reviews, author interviews, industry news and more from the online bookstore with a soul.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:57:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://blog.betterworldbooks.com/2008/10/28/book-review-lila-by-robert-pirsig/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.betterworld.com/?p=2754#comment-756</guid>
		<description>David,
I agree with your assessment to a degree.  Pirsig&#039;s ability to take things apart, inspect them, and put them back together as they were but with a far better understanding is one of his best qualities.  

In terms of his use of &quot;they&quot; I think he got some help from Martin Buber&#039;s &quot;I and Thou&quot; which is an excellent text in regards to something as simply complicated as our use of pronouns.

In any event, as a New Yorker, I love his assessment there, and reading Lila would make anyone want to go on a boat trip; not because he romanticizes it, but rather because he can see the excursion for what it is: as much a journey into the self as down the Hudson River Valley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
I agree with your assessment to a degree.  Pirsig&#8217;s ability to take things apart, inspect them, and put them back together as they were but with a far better understanding is one of his best qualities.  </p>
<p>In terms of his use of &#8220;they&#8221; I think he got some help from Martin Buber&#8217;s &#8220;I and Thou&#8221; which is an excellent text in regards to something as simply complicated as our use of pronouns.</p>
<p>In any event, as a New Yorker, I love his assessment there, and reading Lila would make anyone want to go on a boat trip; not because he romanticizes it, but rather because he can see the excursion for what it is: as much a journey into the self as down the Hudson River Valley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Levins</title>
		<link>http://blog.betterworldbooks.com/2008/10/28/book-review-lila-by-robert-pirsig/comment-page-1/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>David Levins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.betterworld.com/?p=2754#comment-736</guid>
		<description>It’s been said that the world can be divided up into two types of people – those people who like to divide the world up and those people who don’t.  I like dividing things up and found the concepts he develops in Lila helps whittle the world down into smaller, more understandable spaces.

For example, I like the way Pirsig divided Quality up into four patterns - Inorganic, Biological, Social and Intellectual. He said that &quot;social patterns&quot; like New York City devour the energy of its inhabitants (biological) for its own sustenance.

Looking through his prism allows one to unpack the meaning of words like &quot;they&quot;, as in &quot;Why are &#039;they&#039; screwing things up?”.  By seeing &quot;they&quot; as a social pattern rather than a group of people brings new clarity.

Pirsig said that life comes to us as an endless stream of puzzle pieces and I found the pieces he presented in Lila to be reusable in all sorts of puzzles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been said that the world can be divided up into two types of people – those people who like to divide the world up and those people who don’t.  I like dividing things up and found the concepts he develops in Lila helps whittle the world down into smaller, more understandable spaces.</p>
<p>For example, I like the way Pirsig divided Quality up into four patterns &#8211; Inorganic, Biological, Social and Intellectual. He said that &#8220;social patterns&#8221; like New York City devour the energy of its inhabitants (biological) for its own sustenance.</p>
<p>Looking through his prism allows one to unpack the meaning of words like &#8220;they&#8221;, as in &#8220;Why are &#8216;they&#8217; screwing things up?”.  By seeing &#8220;they&#8221; as a social pattern rather than a group of people brings new clarity.</p>
<p>Pirsig said that life comes to us as an endless stream of puzzle pieces and I found the pieces he presented in Lila to be reusable in all sorts of puzzles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Week in Review: October 27-31 &#124; Better World Books Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.betterworldbooks.com/2008/10/28/book-review-lila-by-robert-pirsig/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Week in Review: October 27-31 &#124; Better World Books Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.betterworld.com/?p=2754#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] delved into the morality of new age philosophy&#8230; ok, there&#8217;s sex and drugs involved, is that better? -We highlighted the greatest piece [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] delved into the morality of new age philosophy&#8230; ok, there&#8217;s sex and drugs involved, is that better? -We highlighted the greatest piece [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
