We found a new way to support our Non-Profit Literacy Partners
Posted by admin on 06.16.2009 at 1:24 pm

Great news! As you probably already know, promoting literacy has always been woven into the fabric of our business. Now we’re delighted to announce we’ve given an ownership stake to our non-profit literacy partners. Yup…we’ve granted Incentive Stock Options to these partners – as far as we know, a first for social enterprise.
The purpose of the plan, put together with the help of our primary investor, Good Capital, is to ensure that our literacy partners can have a stake in and share in our financial success.
We’ve put aside roughly 5% of the company for use in stock option grants to an initial group of five literacy partners (with potential to add others in the future): Books for Africa, Invisible Children, Room To Read, WorldFund and the National Center for Family Literacy.
One of our fearless leaders Xavier Helgesen puts it best: “We created Better World Books to show that it is possible to do good while at the same time run a successful company. Our literacy partners are essential to our mission, and we want them to flourish. Today’s announcement ensures that as our company grows, our partners will too.”
Check out the press release to get all the details. Or read more about it at Change.org.
3 Comments » | Tagged Impact, Our Partners, better world books, books for africa, Good Capital, Incentive Stock Options, invisible children, National Center for Family Literacy, room to read, Social Enterprise, social entrepreneurship, worldfund, Xavier Helgesen
« Better World Books Podcast: Matthew Pearl // Did you catch us on Bloomberg TV? »
- Aaron King africa ARC betterworld.com better world books fund Better World Books in the field blog book drive book drives book reviews books books for africa bookstore campus chicago children's books conferences dana barrett david murphy green festival green for all hilarious posts Impact invisible children library literacy literacy statistics massachusetts Natasha National Center for Family Literacy NCFL off-topic Our Partners partner updates Pat Plonski Phi Theta Kappa podcast Poll Wednesday press room to read Show Us Some Love social entrepreneurship Spooky Book of the Day worldfund Xavier Helgesen
- Africa 2010 (10)
- Antiquarian Ramblings (9)
- Ask the Dust: Notes from the Rare Book Section (4)
- Author Podcast (48)
- Better World Book Club (20)
- Book & Author News (49)
- book club (4)
- Book Lists (108)
- Book Reviews (67)
- Books on the Big Screen (7)
- Company News (81)
- Contests (16)
- Dispatches from the Green House (47)
- Flabbergasted (15)
- From our Friends (84)
- holidays (21)
- Impact (179)
- Impact Vignette (5)
- In the News (22)
- LEAP (14)
- Literacy Trips (20)
- Our Partners (184)
- Poll Wednesday (19)
- Show Us Some Love (29)
- Social Enterprise (19)
- South America 2011 (6)
- The Man Behind the Curtain (22)
- Uncategorized (375)
- Video Impact Story (6)
- Week In Review (18)
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
-
Latest Comments
Fair enough, Kathy, and duly noted. Right now the application we use to power th...
I know that this comment isn't really related to this post, but I couldn't find ...
BBW is the best. I've been ordering from them for years. I have always had the b...
my all time favorite was "The Pokey Little Puppy." When I got older it was "Ali...
I loved all things Beverly Cleary when I was a kid. That and, of course, Little...








Leave a Comment »
Trackback | RSS 2.0
so once again corporate america benefits on the back of good deeds. not surprising.
I think it’s more like corporate America benefiting while still managing to do good deeds. The bottom line is that we are giving away part of the company in an effort to benefit our non-profit literacy partners. As stock option holders, our literacy partners will benefit as the value of the business grows.
Here are the details. Our non-profit literacy partners must earn these stock options by meeting their literacy goals. The nature of an option is the right-to-purchase shares at the current price (a.k.a. strike price – a low price per share) at a future date (when there is a high price per share). So the value of their right-to-buy will grow as Better World Books grows since the strike price never changes.
To be clear, we are GIVING UP part of our company so that our non-profit literacy partners will benefit as the value of the business grows. To Katie’s point, if big business ever tried to purchase BWB, this would act to preserve our mission, or at worst result in a windfall for our literacy partners.
Sounds like it’s safe to assume that the strike price is so high that there is no reasonable chance that the non-profit partners will ever exercise those options. If that weren’t the case, I’m sure we’d be hearing about it.
Put another way, did you remember to include the values of those options on your balance sheets? How much were they? Would you offer to buy back those options in cash at that price?
Those are the only relevant details, none of which are contained in the press release. That’s why it’s simply a PR move and not a real donation.
Besides, as noted in the “IAQ”, those profits (underlying said shares underlying said options) are at least partially gained by selling donated materials. I think that’s Katie’s main point, and I think it’s valid.
B Corp isn’t quite doing its job, and shareholders should be concerned about the reputational risk BWB is generating, specifically through its shady campus acquisitions– how will BWB continue to be profitable once donors wise up?